![]() ![]() One of the main differences between Final Cut Pro and Adobe Premiere Pro is pricing.Īlthough Final Cut has a one-time payment of just under $300, it’s just that - a one-time payment. VLC player and Firefox normally do not allow ColorSync control, so they can be easier to use to check non-Mac 'views' of a file.Comparing Final Cut Pro vs Adobe Premiere Pro in 2023 1. Such as QuickTime Player, and Chrome & Safari browsers. It's only lighter when viewed on a Mac, with apps that allow the Mac ColorSync utility to handle color management. So my Rec.709 compliant system will display that file as you see it within Premiere, pretty close. sRGB primaries, D65 white point, gamma 2.4 display transform, around 100IRE/nits total brightness. And all broadcast specs require the 'full' Rec.709. So that 'we' still got essentially the same image. Which had a specific native curve to the shadows of the signal.Īs digital "flat panel" monitors came into existence, Bt.1886 was addended to Rec.709 to compensate for the flat response of the digital panels. The "original" Rec.709 was created while 'we' were still all using CRT monitors. as the only tranform, skipping the also required gamma 2.4 display function added in Bt.1886. It has been years.īecause the problem is specifically caused by Apple's choice to use the camera tranform function. We are the paying customer. Let's put aside our individual desires and focus on the greater good to fix this adobe color space issue so that exports look like the edits. By coming together and finding a solution that works for everyone, we can ensure that the task is completed efficiently and effectively.įrom the thousands if not tens of thousands of people who edit video for devices, we urge you at adobe to consider the benefits of working together and compromising in order to accomplish meaningful this important task. While we respect your beliefs and opinions, it is a little bit selfish to insist on doing things only your way when there are so many other people involved in editing. It is important for us to work together and come to a compromise rather than insisting on doing things solely our own way. However, we must consider the bigger picture and the fact that a much larger group is already working towards completing and editing videos in a certain way specifically for Apple products. We understand that you have strong convictions about the way you believe color space should be accomplished. ![]() The need/use of the LUT could only be changed by a change of the standard used by ColorSync. That dilemma can't be "solved" by a version change with an outside app like Premiere or Resolve. "Normal" viewed outside Premiere on a Mac, but too dark outside of the Macs.A bit light on a Mac, but "normal" outside of Mac displays without the LUT.the choice is between two imperfect things: Because on non-Mac gear, the Rec.709 video file will probably be displayed with a correct 2.4 gamma. That LUT will essentially push the midtones and shadows a bit darker in the exported file, so that when viewed on a Mac, outside of Premiere, the file will look more like it did while viewed in Premiere.īut of course, then outside of the Mac-sphere, on a non-Mac system, that file will now be a lot darker than it appeared on the Mac within Premiere. So the image typically is darker within Premiere than outside on the same Mac computer. Premiere always attempts to operate by the Rec.709 standards, including it's internal monitors which are not 'controlled' by ColorSync. So Rec.709/SDR video files are displayed with lighter shadows and mids on a Mac, than they would be if displayed with the "normal" Rec.709 gamma of 2.4. is caused by the Mac OS color management utility ColorSync applying a non-standard gamma to Rec.709 video files.ColorSync, for some reason, uses a 1.96 gamma.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |